Directly Responsible Individual (DRI)

Defining a single Directly Responsible Individual (DRI) for an outcome is a foundation of effective process and organizational design. It is often misused when the individual doesn't have the right capabilities, capacity, authority, or management.

D. Brown Management Profile Picture
Share

 

 

Adam Lashinsky the author of Inside Apple (2012) describes the Directly Responsible Individual (DRI) in this 2-minute video clip

 

Hyman G. Rickover who is considered the "Father of the Nuclear Navy" described responsibility as:

“Responsibility is a unique concept... 

You may share it with others, but your portion is not diminished. 

You may delegate it, but it is still with you...

If responsibility is rightfully yours, no evasion or ignorance or passing the blame can shift the burden to someone else. 

Unless you can point your finger at the person who is responsible when something goes wrong, then you have never had anyone really responsible.”


 

With that said, there is a lot that goes into effectively defining someone as being responsible:

  1. What level of standards are in place for delivering the expected results?
  2. Is this a first-of-kind for the company, manager, or responsible individual?
  3. Do they have the capabilities required to deliver the expected results?
  4. Are these proven capabilities based on past experience, or hoped-for capabilities based on aptitude
  5. Do they have the capacity required to deliver the expected results in the expected time?
  6. Do they have the right level of authority (decision rights) required to deliver the expected results?
  7. Does their manager have the right combination of capabilities, capacity, and authority to add value to the responsible individual?
  8. Is their manager held accountable for the work product of the responsible individual and their team? 

Keep in mind that accountability and responsibility without prerequisites often ends in failure. 


 

Remember that it is workflows (value stream, process, system) that create the results that you are looking for. There are individuals directly responsible for individual tools, tasks, and decisions within that workflow. There are individuals directly responsibilities for related groups and the workflow as a whole. 

 

 

 



Related Training

Accountability + Compensation: The Myths and Realities
No amount of accountability or compensation will create the competencies and capabilities required to deliver results. If your results are falling short, make sure that you are diagnosing the root cause correctly so you can design the best solution.
Tactical and Strategic Question Categories
When planning, separate the questions you ask yourself into tactical and strategic categories. Answer the strategic ones first, back-checking them against the tactical ones to evaluate the viability of your plans.
Cascading Goal Setting and Management (Objectives and Key Results - OKRs)
Successful outcomes begin with goals being integrated across all parts of a construction business, including multi-company project teams. Management is what ultimately ensures these goals are regularly reviewed and adjusted to stay on track.